I'm a PhD student in economics at Columbia University.
My research interests include growth, welfare and technology. At the moment I’m particularly interested in the influence and management of AI and automation.
I've worked at the Commonwealth Treasury of Australia and the Global Priorities Institute (University of Oxford).
You can reach me at tom.w.houlden[at]gmail.com
Research
When Does Automating AI Research Produce Explosive Growth? Feedback Loops in Innovation Networks (Jan, 2026)
[working paper](with Tom Davidson, Basil Halperin, and Anton Korinek)
Abstract
AI labs are increasingly using AI itself to accelerate AI research, creating a feedback loop that could potentially lead to an "intelligence explosion". We develop a general semi-endogenous growth model with an innovation network, where research and automation in one sector increases the productivity of research in other sectors, and derive a clean analytical condition under which growth becomes super-exponential ("explosive"). The key intuition is that automation of research both offsets diminishing returns to research and increases cross-sectoral research spillovers, making explosive growth more likely. Applying this model to a calibrated, AI-integrated economy, we demonstrate that the growth effects of automation may be slow initially but compound rapidly. In our benchmark calibration, the level of automation needed to double the long-run growth rate already achieves well over half of the automation level needed to generate explosive growth.
Other Work
Aggregating Slow and Fast Growth (March, 2026)
[note]
Abstract
In this note I consider an economy with two factor inputs, one growing exponentially and one growing hyperbolically. I derive the conditions under which aggregate output is growing super exponentially vs subexponentially. In the case where the slow growing factor is in fact fixed, I get a closed form solution for the date at which the growth regime changes from super to subexponential.
Endogenous Dampening in Task Based Models (March, 2026)
[note]
Abstract
This note derives conditions under which an endogenous automation frontier eliminates task bottlenecks in a CES task-based model, despite complementarities across tasks. An expanding AI task share can offset the drag from unbalanced factor growth, and the key condition admits a clean form: automation scales without bottleneck so long as the slope of the AI productivity gradient is less than the elasticity of substitution between AI and labour.
How quick and big would a software intelligence explosion be? (Aug, 2025)
[article], [simulation tool] (with Tom Davidson)